I teach at a parochial school; one where I
enjoy a great deal of freedom to integrate my personal beliefs into platform
instruction. Now, I realize that teachers in the public school arena enjoy
similar freedoms; however, they must tread very carefully, but that is not the
subject of this essay. I fear I squander my freedom, settling for a minimal
approach that focuses on ensuring locally correct social-political beliefs and
my students suffer for it. We enjoy talking about how our educational model
inculcates a “Christian World-View.” We expend a significant amount of
institutional energy talking about it, seeking to define what it is, and
integrating it into our lesson plans. All of this is good, as far as it goes.
Yet, whenever we hear about a student running afoul of our understanding of
Christian morality we engage in serious soul-searching, hoping to find that
chink in our armor or crack in our dike and plaster over it with some new
argument or lesson plan. Still, despite our best efforts, not only do we see
students make poor choices after graduation, we struggle with the same problems
of a public school, only on a smaller scale. Given all of our effort to educate
our students, helping them develop a Christian World-View, why do we see these
things?
First of all, there is no easy fix to the
human condition. If there were, God would have penned a shorter instruction
manual, full of lesson plans complete with aligned objectives that addressed
all the various learning styles and encouraged self-awareness, self-actualization,
and self-moderation. In His wisdom He equipped us with choice, that annoying
ability to choose self-gratification. No matter how high we build the wall or
dig the moat students get a vote; and they often vote contrary to how we think
they should. But this does not fully answer the question. I think we have to
look at what we teach.
Most discussions of a “Christian”
World-View start with some version of the following list of questions:
·
Where did we come from?
·
Why are we here?
·
Is there a God?
·
If there is a God, what does He want?
·
What happens to us after we die?
·
Did we evolve or were we created?
·
Is morality absolute or subjective?
These are good questions, questions
deserving careful examination. How we answer them exerts great influence on how
we view the world. Yet, these questions do not go far enough. So we normally
take the next step, coming up with a more focused list. The list below contains
some of the more common ones:
·
Do you think homosexuality is a sin or an
alternative lifestyle?
·
Is abortion wrong, or is it a woman's right?
·
Should capital punishment be allowed or
abolished?
·
Should more energy be directed at protecting the
seals and whales or cutting down trees to build homes?
·
Should people be drafted for the military?
·
Would you vote Republican, Democrat,
non-partisan, something else, or not at all?
·
Do you think democracy is better than communism
or socialism?
·
Should prostitution be a legitimate business
practice?
·
Should we legalize marijuana and other such
drugs?
·
Should marriage be defined as occurring between
one man and one woman?
Again this is a fine list. It
contains almost all the current significant issues we face in the
socio-political realm. Helping students understand how our world-view
influences key issues is a laudable goal as it shows them how our core beliefs
influence decisions. But we skip the most important step.
In Philippians 3:2-11, Paul address the
key issue; works or relationship. Paul describes in exhausting detail how he,
above all, can stand on his accomplishments. But in the end, no matter how high
he piles up accolades, he still falls short of his ultimate goal. He only finds salvation in the “surpassing
worth of knowing Christ.” He considers everything else worthless dung. He fully
understands the uselessness of works and achievement and willingly gives it all
up in order to know Jesus, resting in His righteousness.
And this is where we make our key mistake.
We assume our students enjoy an intimate relationship with Jesus. We plunge
ahead spending our time on the “hot-button” issues of the day, devoting precious
little time to helping our charges grow in their relationship with Jesus. We
want our pupils to make right choices. We do not want them to be unaware of the
pitfalls that lie ahead. We know that certain key issues, certain collective
forces, certain cultural movements portend unwanted societal shifts and we
labor to seal any perceived chinks in our organizational armor. Those of us who
have reached the half-century mark ought to know better.
The list of “hot-button” issues morph over
time. Societies grow, change, and evolve. What plagued West Texas in the early
70’s does not matter today. We’ve either moved on or decided that issue does
not matter. Much to the astonishment of many of my students, I remember when
Texas was a solidly Democratic state; as was the entire southern section of the
country. When I spend my time as a teacher, an influencer of students, focused
on the issues of the day I ill equip them for the future. By the time they get
out of school the things we discuss in foyers and passionately argue about on
social-media may very well have passed; replaced by a new set. But the key
question remains; how do you relate to Jesus?
I most help my students when I point them
toward Jesus, aiding them in developing a vibrant relationship with Him that
sustains no matter the current turmoil of society. Being able to refute
arguments may prove somewhat useful, being in love with, dedicated and in
submission to Jesus is indispensable to successful navigation of the twists and
turns of life. Our relationship with Him is the grid through which we sort out
the challenges life throws our way. Hot button issues come and go as do the
skills and logic that deals with them. Jesus remains, eternal, ever present,
always able to guide us through the labyrinth of life. This is the world view I
need to communicate to my students, Jesus and the all surpassing worth of
knowing Him.
No comments:
Post a Comment